DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Cristopher Sánchez vs Logan Webb

In 2026 Cristopher Sánchez has been worth 2.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCristopher SánchezLogan Webb
G3327
GS3327
IP207.0160.2
W188
SO231134
ERA2.914.31
FIP2.803.46
WHIP1.201.17
K/910.07.5
BB/92.02.3
FIP−6783
WAR6.13.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCristopher SánchezLogan Webb
G52
GS52
IP26.014.2
W01
SV00
SO2517
BB101
ERA3.120.61
WHIP1.230.68
K/98.710.4
BB/93.50.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCristopher SánchezLogan Webb
G137207
GS118204
IP742.21,223.0
W4878
L2862
SV10
SO7401,128
BB173291
ERA3.153.50
WHIP1.171.19
K/99.08.3
BB/92.12.1
HR/90.80.6
WAR18.830.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.