DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Brent Suter vs Michael Tonkin

In 2025 Brent Suter has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBrent SuterMichael Tonkin
G4821
GS30
IP67.224.0
W12
SO5319
ERA4.524.88
FIP4.574.80
WHIP1.291.17
K/97.07.1
BB/92.43.0
FIP−110115
WAR0.1-0.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBrent SuterMichael Tonkin
G51
GS10
IP7.00.2
W00
SV00
SO51
BB60
ERA5.140.00
WHIP2.143.00
K/96.413.5
BB/97.70.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBrent SuterMichael Tonkin
G402264
GS510
IP688.1329.2
W4516
L2611
SV33
SO574328
BB178115
ERA3.544.23
WHIP1.221.29
K/97.59.0
BB/92.33.1
HR/91.11.3
WAR7.31.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.