Head to head · 2025 pitching

Brent Suter vs Michael Tonkin

In 2025 Brent Suter has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brent Suter CIN

Michael Tonkin MIN

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brent Suter	Michael Tonkin
G	48	21
GS	3	0
IP	67.2	24.0
W	1	2
SO	53	19
ERA	4.52	4.88
FIP	4.57	4.80
WHIP	1.29	1.17
K/9	7.0	7.1
BB/9	2.4	3.0
FIP−	110	115
WAR	0.1	-0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Brent Suter	Michael Tonkin
G	400	230
GS	50	0
IP	684.1	299.1
W	44	16
L	26	11
SV	3	3
SO	570	302
BB	178	106
ERA	3.56	4.33
WHIP	1.23	1.28
K/9	7.5	9.1
BB/9	2.3	3.2
HR/9	1.1	1.4
WAR	7.1	1.2

Brent Suter’s full profile →Michael Tonkin’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brent Suter vs

Michael Tonkin vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.