DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Michael Tonkin vs Lou Trivino III

In 2025 the two have been worth the same 0.0 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMichael TonkinLou Trivino III
G2147
GS02
IP24.047.2
W23
SO1937
ERA4.883.97
FIP4.804.73
WHIP1.171.34
K/97.17.0
BB/93.03.4
FIP−115114
WAR-0.00.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMichael TonkinLou Trivino III
G19
GS00
IP0.29.1
W00
SV00
SO110
BB03
ERA0.000.96
WHIP3.000.75
K/913.59.6
BB/90.02.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMichael TonkinLou Trivino III
G264337
GS03
IP329.2338.1
W1624
L1127
SV337
SO328343
BB115155
ERA4.234.07
WHIP1.291.37
K/99.09.1
BB/93.14.1
HR/91.31.0
WAR1.62.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.