Head to head · 2026 pitching

Trent Thornton vs Lou Trivino III

So far in 2026 Lou Trivino III has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Thornton CHC

Lou Trivino III PHI

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Thornton	Lou Trivino III
G	48	5
GS	0	0
IP	48.1	6.0
W	5	0
SO	31	7
ERA	3.35	15.00
FIP	5.21	6.93
WHIP	1.20	2.83
K/9	5.8	10.5
BB/9	3.2	10.5
FIP−	124	166
WAR	-0.3	-0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Thornton	Lou Trivino III
G	283	337
GS	36	3
IP	449.1	338.1
W	19	24
L	24	27
SV	4	37
SO	410	343
BB	153	155
ERA	4.27	4.07
WHIP	1.32	1.37
K/9	8.2	9.1
BB/9	3.1	4.1
HR/9	1.4	1.0
WAR	2.2	2.6

Trent Thornton’s full profile →Lou Trivino III’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Thornton vs

Lou Trivino III vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.