Head to head · 2026 pitching
Cal Quantrill vs Kumar Rocker
In 2026 Kumar Rocker has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Cal Quantrill | Kumar Rocker |
|---|---|---|
| G | 32 | 30 |
| GS | 15 | 27 |
| IP | 110.0 | 148.0 |
| W | 9 | 6 |
| SO | 81 | 138 |
| ERA | 2.86 | 4.38 |
| FIP | 4.01 | 4.31 |
| WHIP | 1.04 | 1.41 |
| K/9 | 6.6 | 8.4 |
| BB/9 | 2.0 | 3.7 |
| FIP− | 96 | 103 |
| WAR | 1.1 | 1.4 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cal Quantrill | Kumar Rocker |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | — |
| GS | 2 | — |
| IP | 10.1 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 9 | — |
| BB | 5 | — |
| ERA | 5.23 | — |
| WHIP | 1.26 | — |
| K/9 | 7.8 | — |
| BB/9 | 4.4 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cal Quantrill | Kumar Rocker |
|---|---|---|
| G | 219 | 47 |
| GS | 164 | 44 |
| IP | 946.2 | 224.0 |
| W | 56 | 10 |
| L | 51 | 18 |
| SV | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 703 | 208 |
| BB | 294 | 90 |
| ERA | 4.17 | 4.74 |
| WHIP | 1.30 | 1.43 |
| K/9 | 6.7 | 8.4 |
| BB/9 | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| WAR | 6.8 | 1.7 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.