Head to head · 2026 pitching
Taylor Clarke vs Cal Quantrill
In 2026 Cal Quantrill has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Taylor Clarke | Cal Quantrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 71 | 32 |
| GS | 2 | 15 |
| IP | 73.0 | 110.0 |
| W | 2 | 9 |
| SO | 45 | 81 |
| ERA | 2.96 | 2.86 |
| FIP | 3.86 | 4.01 |
| WHIP | 1.00 | 1.04 |
| K/9 | 5.5 | 6.6 |
| BB/9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| FIP− | 92 | 96 |
| WAR | 0.7 | 1.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Taylor Clarke | Cal Quantrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | — | 3 |
| GS | — | 2 |
| IP | — | 10.1 |
| W | — | 0 |
| SV | — | 0 |
| SO | — | 9 |
| BB | — | 5 |
| ERA | — | 5.23 |
| WHIP | — | 1.26 |
| K/9 | — | 7.8 |
| BB/9 | — | 4.4 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Taylor Clarke | Cal Quantrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 305 | 219 |
| GS | 24 | 164 |
| IP | 407.2 | 946.2 |
| W | 18 | 56 |
| L | 20 | 51 |
| SV | 8 | 1 |
| SO | 349 | 703 |
| BB | 120 | 294 |
| ERA | 4.42 | 4.17 |
| WHIP | 1.25 | 1.30 |
| K/9 | 7.7 | 6.7 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| HR/9 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| WAR | 1.5 | 6.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.