DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Edwin Díaz vs Sean Newcomb

In 2026 Sean Newcomb has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticEdwin DíazSean Newcomb
G2160
GS06
IP18.290.1
W22
SO2884
ERA8.683.09
FIP4.443.21
WHIP1.981.18
K/913.58.4
BB/95.33.4
FIP−10677
WAR0.11.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticEdwin DíazSean Newcomb
G1210
GS02
IP17.115.1
W11
SV40
SO2013
BB84
ERA2.081.76
WHIP0.920.78
K/910.47.6
BB/94.22.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticEdwin DíazSean Newcomb
G542283
GS071
IP538.0613.2
W3032
L3835
SV2608
SO867613
BB193301
ERA3.034.03
WHIP1.071.41
K/914.59.0
BB/93.24.4
HR/91.00.9
WAR12.96.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.