Head to head · 2026 pitching
Tanner Banks vs Adam Macko
In 2026 Adam Macko has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Tanner Banks | Adam Macko |
|---|---|---|
| G | 32 | 30 |
| GS | 1 | 1 |
| IP | 36.1 | 31.0 |
| W | 0 | 2 |
| SO | 38 | 32 |
| ERA | 6.19 | 5.23 |
| FIP | 5.19 | 4.88 |
| WHIP | 1.84 | 1.68 |
| K/9 | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| BB/9 | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| FIP− | 124 | 117 |
| WAR | -0.2 | -0.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Tanner Banks | Adam Macko |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | — |
| GS | 0 | — |
| IP | 2.1 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 2 | — |
| BB | 0 | — |
| ERA | 3.86 | — |
| WHIP | 1.29 | — |
| K/9 | 7.7 | — |
| BB/9 | 0.0 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Tanner Banks | Adam Macko |
|---|---|---|
| G | 231 | 30 |
| GS | 7 | 1 |
| IP | 290.0 | 31.0 |
| W | 11 | 2 |
| L | 13 | 0 |
| SV | 4 | 0 |
| SO | 277 | 32 |
| BB | 86 | 14 |
| ERA | 3.97 | 5.23 |
| WHIP | 1.26 | 1.68 |
| K/9 | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| BB/9 | 2.7 | 4.1 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| WAR | 2.6 | -0.1 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.