DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Tanner Banks vs Phil Maton

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticTanner BanksPhil Maton
G3231
GS10
IP36.127.2
W00
SO3831
ERA6.196.18
FIP5.195.49
WHIP1.841.81
K/99.410.1
BB/93.75.2
FIP−124131
WAR-0.2-0.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTanner BanksPhil Maton
G326
GS00
IP2.128.0
W00
SV00
SO228
BB09
ERA3.862.57
WHIP1.291.11
K/97.79.0
BB/90.02.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticTanner BanksPhil Maton
G231509
GS71
IP290.0500.0
W1123
L1321
SV410
SO277570
BB86199
ERA3.974.10
WHIP1.261.29
K/98.610.3
BB/92.73.6
HR/91.21.0
WAR2.64.7

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.