DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Phil Maton vs Kodai Senga

In 2026 Phil Maton has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticPhil MatonKodai Senga
G3131
GS08
IP27.261.1
W00
SO3175
ERA6.187.34
FIP5.495.83
WHIP1.811.65
K/910.111.0
BB/95.26.0
FIP−131139
WAR-0.2-0.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticPhil MatonKodai Senga
G263
GS02
IP28.05.0
W00
SV00
SO284
BB97
ERA2.5712.60
WHIP1.112.60
K/99.07.2
BB/92.912.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticPhil MatonKodai Senga
G50983
GS160
IP500.0346.1
W2320
L2122
SV108
SO570395
BB199174
ERA4.103.77
WHIP1.291.32
K/910.310.3
BB/93.64.5
HR/91.01.1
WAR4.74.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.