Head to head · 2026 batting

Jake Cronenworth vs Ryan O'Hearn

So far in 2026 Ryan O'Hearn has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jake Cronenworth SD

Ryan O'Hearn PIT

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Cronenworth	Ryan O'Hearn
G	101	103
PA	399	425
H	79	101
HR	5	18
RBI	31	73
SB	9	1
AVG	.223	.264
OBP	.306	.329
SLG	.302	.444
OPS	.608	.773
ISO	.079	.180
BB%	9.3%	7.8%
K%	22.3%	21.6%
wOBA	.282	.339
wRC+	78	109
WAR	0.6	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jake Cronenworth	Ryan O'Hearn
G	880	836
PA	3,611	2,902
H	766	661
2B	162	119
3B	26	10
HR	85	102
RBI	400	386
BB	356	250
SO	662	639
SB	33	12
AVG	.244	.254
SLG	.394	.424
WAR	15.5	6.3

Jake Cronenworth’s full profile →Ryan O'Hearn’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Cronenworth vs

Ryan O'Hearn vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.