Head to head · 2025 batting

Jake Cronenworth vs Justyn-Henry Malloy

In 2025 Jake Cronenworth has been worth 3.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Jake Cronenworth SD

Justyn-Henry Malloy DET

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Cronenworth	Justyn-Henry Malloy
G	135	51
PA	515	127
H	103	23
HR	11	1
RBI	59	17
SB	3	0
AVG	.246	.221
OBP	.367	.346
SLG	.377	.308
OPS	.744	.654
ISO	.131	.087
BB%	13.4%	15.7%
K%	20.8%	25.2%
wOBA	.337	.306
wRC+	118	92
WAR	3.1	0.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jake Cronenworth	Justyn-Henry Malloy
G	34	7
PA	128	12
H	24	5
HR	3	0
RBI	11	0
BB	7	2
SO	36	2
SB	1	0
AVG	.211	.556
OBP	.291	.667
SLG	.325	.667
OPS	.616	1.333

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jake Cronenworth	Justyn-Henry Malloy
G	887	120
PA	3,637	357
H	772	64
2B	164	13
3B	26	1
HR	87	9
RBI	410	38
BB	358	43
SO	670	117
SB	33	1
AVG	.245	.209
SLG	.396	.346
WAR	15.9	-0.1

Jake Cronenworth’s full profile →Justyn-Henry Malloy’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Cronenworth vs

Justyn-Henry Malloy vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.