Head to head · 2025 batting

Justyn-Henry Malloy vs Andrew McCutchen

In 2025 Andrew McCutchen has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Justyn-Henry Malloy DET

Andrew McCutchen PIT

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Justyn-Henry Malloy	Andrew McCutchen
G	51	135
PA	127	551
H	23	114
HR	1	13
RBI	17	57
SB	0	1
AVG	.221	.239
OBP	.346	.333
SLG	.308	.367
OPS	.654	.700
ISO	.087	.128
BB%	15.7%	12.2%
K%	25.2%	21.4%
wOBA	.306	.312
wRC+	92	98
WAR	0.0	0.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Justyn-Henry Malloy	Andrew McCutchen
G	7	13
PA	12	53
H	5	11
HR	0	0
RBI	0	1
BB	2	7
SO	2	7
SB	0	0
AVG	.556	.239
OBP	.667	.340
SLG	.667	.261
OPS	1.333	.600

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Justyn-Henry Malloy	Andrew McCutchen
G	120	2,299
PA	357	9,790
H	64	2,280
2B	13	453
3B	1	50
HR	9	333
RBI	38	1,157
BB	43	1,192
SO	117	1,915
SB	1	220
AVG	.209	.271
SLG	.346	.455
WAR	-0.1	61.1

Justyn-Henry Malloy’s full profile →Andrew McCutchen’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Justyn-Henry Malloy vs

Andrew McCutchen vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.