Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Cody Bellinger vs Yandy Díaz

In 2026 Yandy Díaz has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Tampa Bay Rays won 3-0 over the New York Yankees.

Cody Bellinger NYY

Yandy Díaz TB

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Yandy Díaz
G	3	3
PA	12	13
H	1	3
HR	0	0
RBI	0	0
BB	0	1
SO	2	3
SB	0	0
AVG	.083	.250
OBP	.083	.308
SLG	.083	.250
OPS	.167	.558

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Yandy Díaz
G	80	40
PA	319	160
H	61	30
HR	11	4
RBI	41	10
BB	27	15
SO	95	36
SB	14	0
AVG	.210	.208
OBP	.276	.287
SLG	.375	.347
OPS	.650	.635

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Yandy Díaz
G	132	154
PA	562	686
H	132	180
HR	17	22
RBI	73	85
SB	12	3
AVG	.266	.293
OBP	.340	.359
SLG	.431	.446
OPS	.771	.805
ISO	.165	.153
BB%	10.5%	8.2%
K%	15.8%	14.3%
wOBA	.340	.352
wRC+	111	123
WAR	2.4	2.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Yandy Díaz
G	1,283	1,052
PA	5,327	4,441
H	1,234	1,137
2B	236	210
3B	31	8
HR	242	122
RBI	768	509
BB	528	465
SO	1,046	656
SB	116	14
AVG	.261	.291
SLG	.478	.442
WAR	29.3	22.8

Cody Bellinger’s full profile →Yandy Díaz’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cody Bellinger vs

Yandy Díaz vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.