Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Jonathan Aranda vs Cody Bellinger

In 2026 Jonathan Aranda has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Tampa Bay Rays won 3-0 over the New York Yankees.

Jonathan Aranda TB

Cody Bellinger NYY

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Cody Bellinger
G	3	3
PA	13	12
H	4	1
HR	1	0
RBI	2	0
BB	0	0
SO	0	2
SB	0	0
AVG	.333	.083
OBP	.385	.083
SLG	.583	.083
OPS	.968	.167

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Cody Bellinger
G	15	80
PA	60	319
H	13	61
HR	1	11
RBI	5	41
BB	2	27
SO	10	95
SB	0	14
AVG	.241	.210
OBP	.305	.276
SLG	.315	.375
OPS	.620	.650

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Cody Bellinger
G	155	132
PA	668	562
H	159	132
HR	22	17
RBI	92	73
SB	0	12
AVG	.274	.266
OBP	.358	.340
SLG	.434	.431
OPS	.792	.771
ISO	.160	.165
BB%	10.3%	10.5%
K%	24.4%	15.8%
wOBA	.350	.340
wRC+	122	111
WAR	2.8	2.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Cody Bellinger
G	369	1,283
PA	1,423	5,327
H	341	1,234
2B	64	236
3B	1	31
HR	46	242
RBI	184	768
BB	143	528
SO	356	1,046
SB	0	116
AVG	.274	.261
SLG	.438	.478
WAR	6.3	29.3

Jonathan Aranda’s full profile →Cody Bellinger’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jonathan Aranda vs

Cody Bellinger vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.