Head to head · 2026 batting

Jonathan Aranda vs Riley Greene

In 2026 Riley Greene has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Jonathan Aranda TB

Riley Greene DET

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Riley Greene
G	155	140
PA	668	592
H	159	143
HR	22	21
RBI	92	75
SB	0	3
AVG	.274	.280
OBP	.358	.370
SLG	.434	.474
OPS	.792	.844
ISO	.160	.194
BB%	10.3%	12.0%
K%	24.4%	26.5%
wOBA	.350	.369
wRC+	122	138
WAR	2.8	3.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Riley Greene
G	15	15
PA	60	66
H	13	13
HR	1	1
RBI	5	3
BB	2	6
SO	10	14
SB	0	0
AVG	.241	.220
OBP	.305	.303
SLG	.315	.322
OPS	.620	.625

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Riley Greene
G	369	626
PA	1,423	2,665
H	341	636
2B	64	127
3B	1	17
HR	46	97
RBI	184	339
BB	143	252
SO	356	748
SB	0	17
AVG	.274	.268
SLG	.438	.458
WAR	6.3	14.0

Jonathan Aranda’s full profile →Riley Greene’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jonathan Aranda vs

Riley Greene vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.