Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Cody Bellinger vs Caleb Durbin

In 2026 Caleb Durbin has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the New York Yankees won 2-0 over the Boston Red Sox.

Cody Bellinger NYY

Caleb Durbin BOS

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Caleb Durbin
G	2	2
PA	9	7
H	3	0
HR	1	0
RBI	4	0
BB	0	0
SO	1	1
SB	0	0
AVG	.333	.000
OBP	.333	.000
SLG	.667	.000
OPS	1.000	.000

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Caleb Durbin
G	80	11
PA	319	40
H	61	8
HR	11	0
RBI	41	2
BB	27	3
SO	95	9
SB	14	3
AVG	.210	.222
OBP	.276	.300
SLG	.375	.333
OPS	.650	.633

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Caleb Durbin
G	132	151
PA	562	586
H	132	126
HR	17	13
RBI	73	64
SB	12	20
AVG	.266	.248
OBP	.340	.332
SLG	.431	.378
OPS	.771	.710
ISO	.165	.130
BB%	10.5%	8.7%
K%	15.8%	13.5%
wOBA	.340	.320
wRC+	111	99
WAR	2.4	2.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Cody Bellinger	Caleb Durbin
G	1,283	285
PA	5,327	1,092
H	1,234	240
2B	236	50
3B	31	1
HR	242	24
RBI	768	117
BB	528	81
SO	1,046	129
SB	116	38
AVG	.261	.252
SLG	.478	.382
WAR	29.3	4.9

Cody Bellinger’s full profile →Caleb Durbin’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cody Bellinger vs

Caleb Durbin vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.