Head to head · 2024 batting

J.P. Crawford vs Tyler Nevin

In 2024 J.P. Crawford has been worth 1.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.P. Crawford SEA

Tyler Nevin OAK

2024 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Tyler Nevin
G	105	86
PA	451	278
H	79	50
HR	9	7
RBI	37	20
SB	5	1
AVG	.202	.204
OBP	.304	.288
SLG	.321	.331
OPS	.625	.618
ISO	.120	.127
BB%	11.5%	9.0%
K%	22.6%	23.0%
wOBA	.286	.279
wRC+	87	77
WAR	1.4	-0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Tyler Nevin
G	1,034	185
PA	4,349	591
H	923	104
2B	186	19
3B	15	1
HR	80	12
RBI	382	49
BB	503	61
SO	816	140
SB	36	1
AVG	.246	.204
SLG	.367	.315
WAR	20.9	-0.4

J.P. Crawford’s full profile →Tyler Nevin’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.P. Crawford vs

Tyler Nevin vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.