Head to head · 2026 batting

J.P. Crawford vs TJ Friedl

So far in 2026 J.P. Crawford has been worth 2.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.P. Crawford SEA

TJ Friedl CIN

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	TJ Friedl
G	109	81
PA	463	272
H	86	41
HR	13	4
RBI	38	13
SB	1	5
AVG	.222	.172
OBP	.338	.255
SLG	.353	.255
OPS	.691	.510
ISO	.131	.084
BB%	13.4%	8.1%
K%	19.9%	23.2%
wOBA	.318	.239
wRC+	104	46
WAR	1.8	-0.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	TJ Friedl
G	1,034	539
PA	4,349	2,148
H	923	458
2B	186	66
3B	15	17
HR	80	58
RBI	382	214
BB	503	200
SO	816	362
SB	36	60
AVG	.246	.246
SLG	.367	.394
WAR	20.9	10.0

J.P. Crawford’s full profile →TJ Friedl’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.P. Crawford vs

TJ Friedl vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.