Head to head · 2026 batting

J.P. Crawford vs Kyle Tucker

In 2026 Kyle Tucker has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.P. Crawford SEA

Kyle Tucker LAD

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Kyle Tucker
G	115	153
PA	489	627
H	91	126
HR	14	17
RBI	40	70
SB	1	12
AVG	.221	.233
OBP	.335	.330
SLG	.352	.385
OPS	.687	.715
ISO	.131	.152
BB%	13.1%	12.4%
K%	19.8%	16.7%
wOBA	.315	.321
wRC+	101	102
WAR	1.9	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Kyle Tucker
G	1,040	918
PA	4,375	3,785
H	928	874
2B	186	183
3B	15	24
HR	81	164
RBI	384	560
BB	505	441
SO	821	603
SB	36	131
AVG	.245	.266
SLG	.367	.487
WAR	20.9	24.9

J.P. Crawford’s full profile →Kyle Tucker’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.P. Crawford vs

Kyle Tucker vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.