Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Shaw vs Kyle Tucker

In 2026 Kyle Tucker has been worth 1.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Shaw CHC

Kyle Tucker LAD

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Shaw	Kyle Tucker
G	71	153
PA	202	627
H	41	126
HR	5	17
RBI	24	70
SB	4	12
AVG	.237	.233
OBP	.327	.330
SLG	.410	.385
OPS	.737	.715
ISO	.173	.152
BB%	10.4%	12.4%
K%	17.3%	16.7%
wOBA	.328	.321
wRC+	106	102
WAR	0.8	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Shaw	Kyle Tucker
G	194	918
PA	639	3,785
H	130	874
2B	30	183
3B	6	24
HR	18	164
RBI	68	560
BB	59	441
SO	129	603
SB	21	131
AVG	.230	.266
SLG	.399	.487
WAR	2.3	24.9

Matt Shaw’s full profile →Kyle Tucker’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Shaw vs

Kyle Tucker vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.