Head to head · 2026 batting
Matt Shaw vs George Springer
In 2026 Matt Shaw has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Matt Shaw | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 71 | 125 |
| PA | 202 | 517 |
| H | 41 | 115 |
| HR | 5 | 15 |
| RBI | 24 | 54 |
| SB | 4 | 12 |
| AVG | .237 | .249 |
| OBP | .327 | .321 |
| SLG | .410 | .405 |
| OPS | .737 | .726 |
| ISO | .173 | .156 |
| BB% | 10.4% | 9.1% |
| K% | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .328 | .323 |
| wRC+ | 106 | 103 |
| WAR | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Matt Shaw | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 9 | 83 |
| PA | 26 | 384 |
| H | 2 | 93 |
| HR | 0 | 23 |
| RBI | 1 | 48 |
| BB | 6 | 36 |
| SO | 8 | 91 |
| SB | 1 | 4 |
| AVG | .105 | .271 |
| OBP | .320 | .346 |
| SLG | .105 | .534 |
| OPS | .425 | .880 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Matt Shaw | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 194 | 1,564 |
| PA | 639 | 6,892 |
| H | 130 | 1,595 |
| 2B | 30 | 272 |
| 3B | 6 | 25 |
| HR | 18 | 308 |
| RBI | 68 | 850 |
| BB | 59 | 723 |
| SO | 129 | 1,410 |
| SB | 21 | 132 |
| AVG | .230 | .265 |
| SLG | .399 | .472 |
| WAR | 2.3 | 37.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

