Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Shaw vs George Springer

In 2026 Matt Shaw has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Shaw CHC

George Springer TOR

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Shaw	George Springer
G	71	125
PA	202	517
H	41	115
HR	5	15
RBI	24	54
SB	4	12
AVG	.237	.249
OBP	.327	.321
SLG	.410	.405
OPS	.737	.726
ISO	.173	.156
BB%	10.4%	9.1%
K%	17.3%	18.4%
wOBA	.328	.323
wRC+	106	103
WAR	0.8	0.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Shaw	George Springer
G	194	1,486
PA	639	6,547
H	130	1,527
2B	30	264
3B	6	24
HR	18	288
RBI	68	799
BB	59	684
SO	129	1,296
SB	21	127
AVG	.230	.267
SLG	.399	.472
WAR	2.3	35.7

Matt Shaw’s full profile →George Springer’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Shaw vs

George Springer vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.