Head to head · 2026 batting
Cal Raleigh vs George Springer
In 2026 Cal Raleigh has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
2026 season
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 126 | 125 |
| PA | 530 | 517 |
| H | 82 | 115 |
| HR | 23 | 15 |
| RBI | 69 | 54 |
| SB | 2 | 12 |
| AVG | .182 | .249 |
| OBP | .296 | .321 |
| SLG | .368 | .405 |
| OPS | .664 | .726 |
| ISO | .186 | .156 |
| BB% | 13.6% | 9.1% |
| K% | 30.9% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .299 | .323 |
| wRC+ | 90 | 103 |
| WAR | 1.5 | 0.7 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 83 |
| PA | 78 | 384 |
| H | 19 | 93 |
| HR | 6 | 23 |
| RBI | 12 | 48 |
| BB | 10 | 36 |
| SO | 25 | 91 |
| SB | 0 | 4 |
| AVG | .279 | .271 |
| OBP | .372 | .346 |
| SLG | .588 | .534 |
| OPS | .960 | .880 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | George Springer |
|---|---|---|
| G | 744 | 1,564 |
| PA | 2,995 | 6,892 |
| H | 571 | 1,595 |
| 2B | 110 | 272 |
| 3B | 2 | 25 |
| HR | 176 | 308 |
| RBI | 445 | 850 |
| BB | 338 | 723 |
| SO | 860 | 1,410 |
| SB | 23 | 132 |
| AVG | .218 | .265 |
| SLG | .464 | .472 |
| WAR | 18.8 | 37.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

