Head to head · 2026 batting

Cal Raleigh vs George Springer

So far in 2026 Cal Raleigh has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Cal Raleigh SEA

George Springer TOR

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cal Raleigh	George Springer
G	120	120
PA	503	501
H	79	111
HR	23	15
RBI	68	53
SB	2	12
AVG	.184	.249
OBP	.294	.323
SLG	.379	.408
OPS	.673	.731
ISO	.195	.159
BB%	13.1%	9.4%
K%	31.6%	18.0%
wOBA	.302	.325
wRC+	93	104
WAR	1.5	0.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Cal Raleigh	George Springer
G	738	1,481
PA	2,968	6,531
H	568	1,523
2B	110	263
3B	2	24
HR	176	288
RBI	444	798
BB	332	684
SO	855	1,291
SB	23	127
AVG	.219	.267
SLG	.466	.473
WAR	18.8	35.8

Cal Raleigh’s full profile →George Springer’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cal Raleigh vs

George Springer vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.