Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Tucker vs JJ Wetherholt

In 2026 JJ Wetherholt has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Tucker LAD

JJ Wetherholt STL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Tucker	JJ Wetherholt
G	153	138
PA	627	619
H	126	130
HR	17	17
RBI	70	51
SB	12	14
AVG	.233	.242
OBP	.330	.339
SLG	.385	.365
OPS	.715	.704
ISO	.152	.123
BB%	12.4%	10.3%
K%	16.7%	16.8%
wOBA	.321	.320
wRC+	102	105
WAR	2.1	3.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Tucker	JJ Wetherholt
G	918	138
PA	3,785	619
H	874	130
2B	183	15
3B	24	0
HR	164	17
RBI	560	51
BB	441	64
SO	603	104
SB	131	14
AVG	.266	.242
SLG	.487	.365
WAR	24.9	3.1

Kyle Tucker’s full profile →JJ Wetherholt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Tucker vs

JJ Wetherholt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.