Head to head · 2026 batting

J.P. Crawford vs Lars Nootbaar

In 2026 J.P. Crawford has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.P. Crawford SEA

Lars Nootbaar STL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Lars Nootbaar
G	115	90
PA	489	334
H	91	68
HR	14	8
RBI	40	33
SB	1	2
AVG	.221	.239
OBP	.335	.342
SLG	.352	.379
OPS	.687	.721
ISO	.131	.140
BB%	13.1%	13.8%
K%	19.8%	21.0%
wOBA	.315	.323
wRC+	101	108
WAR	1.9	0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	J.P. Crawford	Lars Nootbaar
G	1,040	604
PA	4,375	2,296
H	928	475
2B	186	98
3B	15	10
HR	81	66
RBI	384	227
BB	505	298
SO	821	466
SB	36	30
AVG	.245	.241
SLG	.367	.402
WAR	20.9	8.8

J.P. Crawford’s full profile →Lars Nootbaar’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.P. Crawford vs

Lars Nootbaar vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.