Head to head · 2024 pitching

Chad Green vs Daniel Hudson

In 2024 Daniel Hudson has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Chad Green TOR

Daniel Hudson LAD

2024 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Chad Green	Daniel Hudson
G	53	65
GS	0	0
IP	53.1	63.0
W	4	6
SO	46	63
ERA	3.21	3.00
FIP	4.29	4.18
WHIP	1.03	1.03
K/9	7.8	9.0
BB/9	2.4	2.7
FIP−	105	103
WAR	0.2	0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Chad Green	Daniel Hudson
G	382	482
GS	24	3
IP	492.2	471.1
W	43	37
L	30	27
SV	29	43
SO	591	511
BB	127	179
ERA	3.43	3.72
WHIP	1.07	1.23
K/9	10.8	9.8
BB/9	2.3	3.4
HR/9	1.4	1.1
WAR	6.5	4.6

Chad Green’s full profile →Daniel Hudson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Chad Green vs

Daniel Hudson vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.