Head to head · 2026 batting

Rafael Devers vs Matt Olson

In 2026 Rafael Devers has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Rafael Devers SF

Matt Olson ATL

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Rafael Devers	Matt Olson
G	148	162
PA	633	698
H	144	157
HR	37	41
RBI	98	93
SB	0	4
AVG	.258	.251
OBP	.340	.321
SLG	.525	.502
OPS	.865	.823
ISO	.267	.251
BB%	10.9%	9.2%
K%	25.4%	24.5%
wOBA	.368	.352
wRC+	138	121
WAR	3.6	3.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Rafael Devers	Matt Olson
G	26	26
PA	102	108
H	27	17
HR	8	5
RBI	26	11
BB	12	16
SO	25	27
SB	1	0
AVG	.303	.187
OBP	.382	.306
SLG	.573	.352
OPS	.955	.657

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Rafael Devers	Matt Olson
G	1,290	1,381
PA	5,577	5,895
H	1,359	1,312
2B	324	284
3B	13	7
HR	272	329
RBI	845	901
BB	539	677
SO	1,247	1,409
SB	33	13
AVG	.274	.256
SLG	.508	.507
WAR	37.4	33.0

Rafael Devers’s full profile →Matt Olson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Rafael Devers vs

Matt Olson vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.