Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting

Yandy Díaz vs Brayan Rocchio

In 2026 Brayan Rocchio has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALCS, where the Tampa Bay Rays won 4-2 over the Cleveland Guardians.

Yandy Díaz TB

Brayan Rocchio CLE

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALCS.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Brayan Rocchio
G	6	6
PA	28	21
H	9	3
HR	2	0
RBI	4	1
BB	0	0
SO	6	6
SB	0	0
AVG	.333	.143
OBP	.357	.143
SLG	.704	.143
OPS	1.061	.286

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Brayan Rocchio
G	40	24
PA	160	87
H	30	18
HR	4	2
RBI	10	5
BB	15	8
SO	36	19
SB	0	1
AVG	.208	.234
OBP	.287	.306
SLG	.347	.338
OPS	.635	.644

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Brayan Rocchio
G	154	153
PA	686	592
H	180	135
HR	22	15
RBI	85	73
SB	3	20
AVG	.293	.253
OBP	.359	.313
SLG	.446	.391
OPS	.805	.705
ISO	.153	.139
BB%	8.2%	6.4%
K%	14.3%	14.4%
wOBA	.352	.313
wRC+	123	95
WAR	2.5	2.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Brayan Rocchio
G	1,052	418
PA	4,441	1,503
H	1,137	314
2B	210	67
3B	8	4
HR	122	28
RBI	509	161
BB	465	108
SO	656	279
SB	14	38
AVG	.291	.234
SLG	.442	.352
WAR	22.8	3.5

Yandy Díaz’s full profile →Brayan Rocchio’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Yandy Díaz vs

Brayan Rocchio vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.