Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Jonathan Aranda vs Brayan Rocchio
In 2026 Jonathan Aranda has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Brayan Rocchio |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 6 |
| PA | 27 | 21 |
| H | 5 | 3 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 3 | 1 |
| BB | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 5 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .217 | .143 |
| OBP | .308 | .143 |
| SLG | .217 | .143 |
| OPS | .525 | .286 |
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Brayan Rocchio |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 24 |
| PA | 60 | 87 |
| H | 13 | 18 |
| HR | 1 | 2 |
| RBI | 5 | 5 |
| BB | 2 | 8 |
| SO | 10 | 19 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .241 | .234 |
| OBP | .305 | .306 |
| SLG | .315 | .338 |
| OPS | .620 | .644 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Brayan Rocchio |
|---|---|---|
| G | 155 | 153 |
| PA | 668 | 592 |
| H | 159 | 135 |
| HR | 22 | 15 |
| RBI | 92 | 73 |
| SB | 0 | 20 |
| AVG | .274 | .253 |
| OBP | .358 | .313 |
| SLG | .434 | .391 |
| OPS | .792 | .705 |
| ISO | .160 | .139 |
| BB% | 10.3% | 6.4% |
| K% | 24.4% | 14.4% |
| wOBA | .350 | .313 |
| wRC+ | 122 | 95 |
| WAR | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Brayan Rocchio |
|---|---|---|
| G | 369 | 418 |
| PA | 1,423 | 1,503 |
| H | 341 | 314 |
| 2B | 64 | 67 |
| 3B | 1 | 4 |
| HR | 46 | 28 |
| RBI | 184 | 161 |
| BB | 143 | 108 |
| SO | 356 | 279 |
| SB | 0 | 38 |
| AVG | .274 | .234 |
| SLG | .438 | .352 |
| WAR | 6.3 | 3.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

