DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 NLDS pitching

Michael King vs Jacob Misiorowski

In 2026 Jacob Misiorowski has been worth 4.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
StatisticMichael KingJacob Misiorowski
G21
GS11
IP7.04.0
W00
SV10
SO76
BB21
ERA1.294.50
WHIP0.861.25
K/99.013.5
BB/92.62.3
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMichael KingJacob Misiorowski
G77
GS44
IP29.031.0
W34
SV10
SO3432
BB69
ERA1.861.74
WHIP0.761.00
K/910.69.3
BB/91.92.6

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMichael KingJacob Misiorowski
G3230
GS3230
IP185.0174.2
W1216
SO159252
ERA3.211.80
FIP4.142.17
WHIP1.180.80
K/97.713.0
BB/93.42.3
FIP−9952
WAR2.26.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMichael KingJacob Misiorowski
G19345
GS9644
IP679.2240.2
W4321
L398
SV70
SO718339
BB24275
ERA3.232.51
WHIP1.190.92
K/99.512.7
BB/93.22.8
HR/91.00.8
WAR10.87.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.