DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 NLDS pitching

Logan Henderson vs Michael King

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 2.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
StatisticLogan HendersonMichael King
G12
GS11
IP5.07.0
W00
SV01
SO47
BB32
ERA1.801.29
WHIP1.000.86
K/97.29.0
BB/95.42.6
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticLogan HendersonMichael King
G37
GS34
IP12.029.0
W03
SV01
SO1034
BB66
ERA4.501.86
WHIP1.170.76
K/97.510.6
BB/94.51.9

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticLogan HendersonMichael King
G1832
GS1832
IP98.1185.0
W1112
SO110159
ERA2.473.21
FIP3.334.14
WHIP0.841.18
K/910.17.7
BB/91.73.4
FIP−8099
WAR2.22.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticLogan HendersonMichael King
G23193
GS2396
IP123.2679.2
W1443
L339
SV07
SO143718
BB27242
ERA2.333.23
WHIP0.871.19
K/910.49.5
BB/92.03.2
HR/91.21.0
WAR2.810.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.