Head to head · 2026 pitching
Griffin Canning vs Emerson Hancock
So far in 2026 Emerson Hancock has been worth 1.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
| Statistic | Griffin Canning | Emerson Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 25 |
| GS | 11 | 25 |
| IP | 83.2 | 138.2 |
| W | 4 | 7 |
| SO | 83 | 126 |
| ERA | 5.59 | 3.57 |
| FIP | 4.68 | 4.00 |
| WHIP | 1.51 | 1.14 |
| K/9 | 8.9 | 8.2 |
| BB/9 | 4.1 | 2.1 |
| FIP− | 112 | 96 |
| WAR | 0.1 | 1.8 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Griffin Canning | Emerson Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| G | 143 | 62 |
| GS | 121 | 56 |
| IP | 668.0 | 301.1 |
| W | 36 | 15 |
| L | 46 | 17 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 636 | 235 |
| BB | 256 | 85 |
| ERA | 4.77 | 4.24 |
| WHIP | 1.36 | 1.26 |
| K/9 | 8.6 | 7.0 |
| BB/9 | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| HR/9 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| WAR | 4.4 | 1.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

