Head to head · 2025 pitching
Nabil Crismatt vs Emerson Hancock
In 2025 Nabil Crismatt has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2025 season
| Statistic | Nabil Crismatt | Emerson Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| G | 8 | 22 |
| GS | 5 | 16 |
| IP | 34.0 | 90.0 |
| W | 3 | 4 |
| SO | 25 | 64 |
| ERA | 3.71 | 4.90 |
| FIP | 4.84 | 5.08 |
| WHIP | 1.44 | 1.38 |
| K/9 | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| BB/9 | 2.4 | 3.1 |
| FIP− | 116 | 122 |
| WAR | 0.1 | -0.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Nabil Crismatt | Emerson Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| G | — | 2 |
| GS | — | 0 |
| IP | — | 4.0 |
| W | — | 0 |
| SV | — | 0 |
| SO | — | 3 |
| BB | — | 5 |
| ERA | — | 4.50 |
| WHIP | — | 1.75 |
| K/9 | — | 6.8 |
| BB/9 | — | 11.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Nabil Crismatt | Emerson Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| G | 122 | 62 |
| GS | 6 | 56 |
| IP | 211.0 | 301.1 |
| W | 12 | 15 |
| L | 6 | 17 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 187 | 235 |
| BB | 63 | 85 |
| ERA | 3.71 | 4.24 |
| WHIP | 1.32 | 1.26 |
| K/9 | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| BB/9 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| WAR | 1.4 | 1.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.