DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Emerson Hancock vs Justin Wrobleski

In 2026 Emerson Hancock has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticEmerson HancockJustin Wrobleski
G2528
GS2522
IP138.2140.0
W712
SO126118
ERA3.573.66
FIP4.004.14
WHIP1.141.14
K/98.27.6
BB/92.12.0
FIP−9699
WAR1.91.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticEmerson HancockJustin Wrobleski
G26
GS00
IP4.07.1
W00
SV00
SO310
BB50
ERA4.501.23
WHIP1.750.95
K/96.812.3
BB/911.30.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticEmerson HancockJustin Wrobleski
G6260
GS5630
IP301.1243.0
W1518
L1712
SV03
SO235220
BB8564
ERA4.244.15
WHIP1.261.20
K/97.08.1
BB/92.52.4
HR/91.41.3
WAR1.42.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.