Head to head · 2026 pitching

Emerson Hancock vs Justin Wrobleski

In 2026 Emerson Hancock has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Emerson Hancock SEA

Justin Wrobleski LAD

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Emerson Hancock	Justin Wrobleski
G	25	28
GS	25	22
IP	138.2	140.0
W	7	12
SO	126	118
ERA	3.57	3.66
FIP	4.00	4.14
WHIP	1.14	1.14
K/9	8.2	7.6
BB/9	2.1	2.0
FIP−	96	99
WAR	1.9	1.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Emerson Hancock	Justin Wrobleski
G	62	60
GS	56	30
IP	301.1	243.0
W	15	18
L	17	12
SV	0	3
SO	235	220
BB	85	64
ERA	4.24	4.15
WHIP	1.26	1.20
K/9	7.0	8.1
BB/9	2.5	2.4
HR/9	1.4	1.3
WAR	1.4	2.4

Emerson Hancock’s full profile →Justin Wrobleski’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Emerson Hancock vs

Justin Wrobleski vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.