DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Gerrit Cole vs Emerson Hancock

In 2026 Gerrit Cole has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticGerrit ColeEmerson Hancock
G2225
GS2225
IP127.0138.2
W107
SO131126
ERA3.613.57
FIP3.934.00
WHIP1.101.14
K/99.38.2
BB/91.82.1
FIP−9496
WAR2.01.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticGerrit ColeEmerson Hancock
G232
GS230
IP138.14.0
W110
SV00
SO1613
BB375
ERA2.734.50
WHIP1.031.75
K/910.56.8
BB/92.411.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticGerrit ColeEmerson Hancock
G33962
GS33956
IP2,081.0301.1
W16315
L8917
SV00
SO2,382235
BB52585
ERA3.204.24
WHIP1.091.26
K/910.37.0
BB/92.32.5
HR/91.01.4
WAR48.11.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.