Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
William Contreras vs Jackson Merrill
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 3.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | William Contreras | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 18 | 17 |
| H | 6 | 3 |
| HR | 2 | 0 |
| RBI | 2 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 0 |
| SO | 1 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .375 | .176 |
| OBP | .444 | .176 |
| SLG | .750 | .176 |
| OPS | 1.194 | .353 |
| Statistic | William Contreras | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 31 | 16 |
| PA | 127 | 64 |
| H | 33 | 16 |
| HR | 5 | 2 |
| RBI | 14 | 9 |
| BB | 12 | 5 |
| SO | 24 | 16 |
| SB | 1 | 2 |
| AVG | .287 | .281 |
| OBP | .354 | .333 |
| SLG | .452 | .474 |
| OPS | .807 | .807 |
2026 season
| Statistic | William Contreras | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 147 | 157 |
| PA | 640 | 664 |
| H | 153 | 156 |
| HR | 18 | 26 |
| RBI | 94 | 87 |
| SB | 1 | 27 |
| AVG | .270 | .254 |
| OBP | .341 | .303 |
| SLG | .417 | .440 |
| OPS | .758 | .743 |
| ISO | .147 | .186 |
| BB% | 9.5% | 6.2% |
| K% | 14.7% | 24.1% |
| wOBA | .332 | .322 |
| wRC+ | 109 | 106 |
| WAR | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | William Contreras | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 744 | 425 |
| PA | 3,160 | 1,740 |
| H | 755 | 434 |
| 2B | 149 | 82 |
| 3B | 6 | 17 |
| HR | 103 | 66 |
| RBI | 409 | 244 |
| BB | 344 | 103 |
| SO | 641 | 369 |
| SB | 24 | 44 |
| AVG | .272 | .270 |
| SLG | .442 | .465 |
| WAR | 21.6 | 11.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

