Head to head · 2026 batting

Cal Raleigh vs Kyle Schwarber

In 2026 Kyle Schwarber has been worth 2.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2025 by dbWAR.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Cal Raleigh SEA

Kyle Schwarber PHI

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cal Raleigh	Kyle Schwarber
G	126	156
PA	530	701
H	82	135
HR	23	45
RBI	69	97
SB	2	3
AVG	.182	.232
OBP	.296	.354
SLG	.368	.503
OPS	.664	.857
ISO	.186	.270
BB%	13.6%	15.0%
K%	30.9%	31.4%
wOBA	.299	.371
wRC+	90	130
WAR	1.5	3.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Cal Raleigh	Kyle Schwarber
G	17	76
PA	78	309
H	19	61
HR	6	24
RBI	12	38
BB	10	48
SO	25	83
SB	0	5
AVG	.279	.239
OBP	.372	.366
SLG	.588	.549
OPS	.960	.915

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Cal Raleigh	Kyle Schwarber
G	744	1,446
PA	2,995	6,085
H	571	1,185
2B	110	195
3B	2	15
HR	176	385
RBI	445	881
BB	338	869
SO	860	1,747
SB	23	40
AVG	.218	.231
SLG	.464	.500
WAR	18.8	33.3

Cal Raleigh’s full profile →Kyle Schwarber’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cal Raleigh vs

Kyle Schwarber vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.