Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Drake Baldwin vs Kyle Schwarber

In 2026 Drake Baldwin has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the Atlanta Braves won 2-1 over the Philadelphia Phillies.

Drake Baldwin ATL

Kyle Schwarber PHI

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Kyle Schwarber
G	3	3
PA	13	13
H	2	4
HR	0	1
RBI	1	1
BB	0	2
SO	3	4
SB	0	0
AVG	.154	.364
OBP	.154	.462
SLG	.231	.636
OPS	.385	1.098

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Kyle Schwarber
G	7	76
PA	30	309
H	3	61
HR	0	24
RBI	2	38
BB	3	48
SO	8	83
SB	0	5
AVG	.111	.239
OBP	.200	.366
SLG	.148	.549
OPS	.348	.915

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Kyle Schwarber
G	138	156
PA	615	701
H	156	135
HR	25	45
RBI	79	97
SB	3	3
AVG	.284	.232
OBP	.358	.354
SLG	.459	.503
OPS	.817	.857
ISO	.175	.270
BB%	8.9%	15.0%
K%	21.5%	31.4%
wOBA	.359	.371
wRC+	126	130
WAR	4.0	3.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Kyle Schwarber
G	261	1,446
PA	1,061	6,085
H	267	1,185
2B	39	195
3B	2	15
HR	44	385
RBI	159	881
BB	93	869
SO	200	1,747
SB	3	40
AVG	.280	.231
SLG	.463	.500
WAR	7.5	33.3

Drake Baldwin’s full profile →Kyle Schwarber’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Drake Baldwin vs

Kyle Schwarber vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.