Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Matt Olson vs Kyle Schwarber
In 2026 Kyle Schwarber has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Matt Olson | Kyle Schwarber |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 13 | 13 |
| H | 2 | 4 |
| HR | 1 | 1 |
| RBI | 3 | 1 |
| BB | 1 | 2 |
| SO | 4 | 4 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .182 | .364 |
| OBP | .231 | .462 |
| SLG | .455 | .636 |
| OPS | .685 | 1.098 |
| Statistic | Matt Olson | Kyle Schwarber |
|---|---|---|
| G | 26 | 76 |
| PA | 108 | 309 |
| H | 17 | 61 |
| HR | 5 | 24 |
| RBI | 11 | 38 |
| BB | 16 | 48 |
| SO | 27 | 83 |
| SB | 0 | 5 |
| AVG | .187 | .239 |
| OBP | .306 | .366 |
| SLG | .352 | .549 |
| OPS | .657 | .915 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Matt Olson | Kyle Schwarber |
|---|---|---|
| G | 162 | 156 |
| PA | 698 | 701 |
| H | 157 | 135 |
| HR | 41 | 45 |
| RBI | 93 | 97 |
| SB | 4 | 3 |
| AVG | .251 | .232 |
| OBP | .321 | .354 |
| SLG | .502 | .503 |
| OPS | .823 | .857 |
| ISO | .251 | .270 |
| BB% | 9.2% | 15.0% |
| K% | 24.5% | 31.4% |
| wOBA | .352 | .371 |
| wRC+ | 121 | 130 |
| WAR | 3.1 | 3.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Matt Olson | Kyle Schwarber |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,381 | 1,446 |
| PA | 5,895 | 6,085 |
| H | 1,312 | 1,185 |
| 2B | 284 | 195 |
| 3B | 7 | 15 |
| HR | 329 | 385 |
| RBI | 901 | 881 |
| BB | 677 | 869 |
| SO | 1,409 | 1,747 |
| SB | 13 | 40 |
| AVG | .256 | .231 |
| SLG | .507 | .500 |
| WAR | 33.0 | 33.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

