DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Tyler Holton vs Jacob Webb

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.5 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticTyler HoltonJacob Webb
G6768
GS30
IP72.067.0
W26
SO5573
ERA2.753.36
FIP4.064.03
WHIP1.251.25
K/96.99.8
BB/92.43.4
FIP−9796
WAR0.50.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTyler HoltonJacob Webb
G119
GS20
IP10.18.2
W00
SV10
SO812
BB24
ERA6.109.35
WHIP1.261.96
K/97.012.5
BB/91.74.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticTyler HoltonJacob Webb
G272315
GS190
IP339.1320.0
W1823
L1419
SV1116
SO276317
BB73132
ERA2.653.07
WHIP0.971.21
K/97.38.9
BB/91.93.7
HR/91.11.1
WAR3.72.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.