Head to head · 2026 batting

Jake Mangum vs Chandler Simpson

In 2026 Chandler Simpson has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Jake Mangum PIT

Chandler Simpson TB

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Mangum	Chandler Simpson
G	127	149
PA	479	612
H	120	176
HR	5	0
RBI	33	38
SB	23	46
AVG	.276	.308
OBP	.331	.335
SLG	.363	.357
OPS	.694	.692
ISO	.087	.049
BB%	5.2%	4.2%
K%	19.4%	7.8%
wOBA	.312	.308
wRC+	92	93
WAR	1.2	1.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jake Mangum	Chandler Simpson
G	—	13
PA	—	48
H	—	14
HR	—	0
RBI	—	7
BB	—	1
SO	—	3
SB	—	5
AVG	—	.311
OBP	—	.319
SLG	—	.422
OPS	—	.741

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jake Mangum	Chandler Simpson
G	244	257
PA	907	1,053
H	240	298
2B	37	31
3B	3	9
HR	8	0
RBI	73	64
BB	44	46
SO	157	91
SB	50	90
AVG	.286	.303
SLG	.365	.352
WAR	2.7	2.7

Jake Mangum’s full profile →Chandler Simpson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Mangum vs

Chandler Simpson vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.