Head to head · 2026 batting
Justin Crawford vs Jake Mangum
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Justin Crawford | Jake Mangum |
|---|---|---|
| G | 145 | 127 |
| PA | 465 | 479 |
| H | 112 | 120 |
| HR | 3 | 5 |
| RBI | 41 | 33 |
| SB | 17 | 23 |
| AVG | .264 | .276 |
| OBP | .309 | .331 |
| SLG | .353 | .363 |
| OPS | .662 | .694 |
| ISO | .089 | .087 |
| BB% | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| K% | 17.6% | 19.4% |
| wOBA | .296 | .312 |
| wRC+ | 81 | 92 |
| WAR | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Justin Crawford | Jake Mangum |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | — |
| PA | 7 | — |
| H | 1 | — |
| HR | 0 | — |
| RBI | 0 | — |
| BB | 0 | — |
| SO | 0 | — |
| SB | 0 | — |
| AVG | .143 | — |
| OBP | .143 | — |
| SLG | .143 | — |
| OPS | .286 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Justin Crawford | Jake Mangum |
|---|---|---|
| G | 145 | 244 |
| PA | 465 | 907 |
| H | 112 | 240 |
| 2B | 19 | 37 |
| 3B | 5 | 3 |
| HR | 3 | 8 |
| RBI | 41 | 73 |
| BB | 27 | 44 |
| SO | 82 | 157 |
| SB | 17 | 50 |
| AVG | .264 | .286 |
| SLG | .353 | .365 |
| WAR | 1.2 | 2.7 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.