Head to head · 2026 batting

Justin Crawford vs Jake Mangum

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Justin Crawford PHI

Jake Mangum PIT

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Justin Crawford	Jake Mangum
G	145	127
PA	465	479
H	112	120
HR	3	5
RBI	41	33
SB	17	23
AVG	.264	.276
OBP	.309	.331
SLG	.353	.363
OPS	.662	.694
ISO	.089	.087
BB%	5.8%	5.2%
K%	17.6%	19.4%
wOBA	.296	.312
wRC+	81	92
WAR	1.2	1.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Justin Crawford	Jake Mangum
G	145	244
PA	465	907
H	112	240
2B	19	37
3B	5	3
HR	3	8
RBI	41	73
BB	27	44
SO	82	157
SB	17	50
AVG	.264	.286
SLG	.353	.365
WAR	1.2	2.7

Justin Crawford’s full profile →Jake Mangum’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Justin Crawford vs

Jake Mangum vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.