Head to head · 2026 batting

Justin Crawford vs Jared Triolo

In 2026 Justin Crawford has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Justin Crawford PHI

Jared Triolo PIT

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Justin Crawford	Jared Triolo
G	145	113
PA	465	362
H	112	77
HR	3	3
RBI	41	29
SB	17	13
AVG	.264	.238
OBP	.309	.307
SLG	.353	.302
OPS	.662	.610
ISO	.089	.065
BB%	5.8%	7.7%
K%	17.6%	19.9%
wOBA	.296	.281
wRC+	81	71
WAR	1.2	0.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Justin Crawford	Jared Triolo
G	145	388
PA	465	1,393
H	112	291
2B	19	49
3B	5	3
HR	3	22
RBI	41	120
BB	27	133
SO	82	329
SB	17	40
AVG	.264	.237
SLG	.353	.335
WAR	1.2	3.5

Justin Crawford’s full profile →Jared Triolo’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Justin Crawford vs

Jared Triolo vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.