Head to head · 2026 pitching
Chris Paddack vs Matt Waldron
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Chris Paddack | Matt Waldron |
|---|---|---|
| G | 14 | 17 |
| GS | 9 | 4 |
| IP | 57.0 | 42.2 |
| W | 0 | 2 |
| SO | 40 | 33 |
| ERA | 6.79 | 6.54 |
| FIP | 4.86 | 4.60 |
| WHIP | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| K/9 | 6.3 | 7.0 |
| BB/9 | 3.0 | 2.3 |
| FIP− | 116 | 110 |
| WAR | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Chris Paddack | Matt Waldron |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | — |
| GS | 1 | — |
| IP | 6.0 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 7 | — |
| BB | 0 | — |
| ERA | 9.00 | — |
| WHIP | 1.50 | — |
| K/9 | 10.5 | — |
| BB/9 | 0.0 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Chris Paddack | Matt Waldron |
|---|---|---|
| G | 133 | 53 |
| GS | 119 | 37 |
| IP | 638.2 | 235.1 |
| W | 32 | 10 |
| L | 43 | 17 |
| SV | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 569 | 200 |
| BB | 145 | 69 |
| ERA | 4.83 | 5.16 |
| WHIP | 1.26 | 1.34 |
| K/9 | 8.0 | 7.6 |
| BB/9 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| HR/9 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| WAR | 7.0 | 1.2 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.