Head to head · 2026 batting

Ian Happ vs Kyle Manzardo

In 2026 Ian Happ has been worth 1.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Ian Happ CHC

Kyle Manzardo CLE

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ian Happ	Kyle Manzardo
G	155	102
PA	636	356
H	119	67
HR	24	13
RBI	68	39
SB	4	0
AVG	.218	.215
OBP	.326	.306
SLG	.412	.378
OPS	.738	.684
ISO	.194	.163
BB%	12.7%	10.1%
K%	29.7%	32.0%
wOBA	.328	.308
wRC+	106	91
WAR	2.0	0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Ian Happ	Kyle Manzardo
G	1,282	296
PA	5,085	1,043
H	1,069	211
2B	245	41
3B	19	3
HR	197	45
RBI	625	124
BB	621	93
SO	1,364	290
SB	74	2
AVG	.243	.228
SLG	.442	.424
WAR	23.3	1.4

Ian Happ’s full profile →Kyle Manzardo’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ian Happ vs

Kyle Manzardo vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.