Head to head · 2026 batting

Harrison Bader vs Kyle Isbel

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Harrison Bader SF

Kyle Isbel KC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Harrison Bader	Kyle Isbel
G	30	93
PA	111	308
H	18	61
HR	5	6
RBI	14	24
SB	0	6
AVG	.170	.218
OBP	.198	.263
SLG	.358	.321
OPS	.557	.585
ISO	.189	.104
BB%	3.6%	4.9%
K%	30.6%	22.4%
wOBA	.238	.261
wRC+	45	58
WAR	-0.4	-0.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Harrison Bader	Kyle Isbel
G	913	562
PA	3,157	1,817
H	697	388
2B	135	75
3B	14	21
HR	93	29
RBI	336	168
BB	218	105
SO	777	388
SB	105	39
AVG	.244	.234
SLG	.400	.357
WAR	10.2	1.9

Harrison Bader’s full profile →Kyle Isbel’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Harrison Bader vs

Kyle Isbel vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.