Head to head · 2026 pitching
Garrett Cleavinger vs Jordan Romano
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.3 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Jordan Romano |
|---|---|---|
| G | 51 | 38 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 41.1 | 33.2 |
| W | 4 | 0 |
| SO | 54 | 39 |
| ERA | 4.79 | 5.61 |
| FIP | 4.12 | 4.11 |
| WHIP | 1.43 | 1.43 |
| K/9 | 11.8 | 10.4 |
| BB/9 | 4.8 | 5.1 |
| FIP− | 99 | 98 |
| WAR | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Jordan Romano |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 2 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 4.1 | 3.0 |
| W | 0 | 0 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 8 | 5 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| ERA | 4.15 | 6.00 |
| WHIP | 0.92 | 2.00 |
| K/9 | 16.6 | 15.0 |
| BB/9 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Jordan Romano |
|---|---|---|
| G | 241 | 318 |
| GS | 1 | 0 |
| IP | 216.1 | 306.0 |
| W | 17 | 22 |
| L | 20 | 25 |
| SV | 10 | 128 |
| SO | 275 | 371 |
| BB | 96 | 124 |
| ERA | 3.49 | 3.94 |
| WHIP | 1.23 | 1.22 |
| K/9 | 11.4 | 10.9 |
| BB/9 | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| WAR | 1.7 | 3.2 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.