Head to head · 2026 pitching
Garrett Cleavinger vs Emilio Pagán
In 2026 Garrett Cleavinger has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Emilio Pagán |
|---|---|---|
| G | 51 | 45 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 41.1 | 42.2 |
| W | 4 | 5 |
| SO | 54 | 45 |
| ERA | 4.79 | 3.38 |
| FIP | 4.12 | 4.18 |
| WHIP | 1.43 | 1.03 |
| K/9 | 11.8 | 9.5 |
| BB/9 | 4.8 | 2.3 |
| FIP− | 99 | 100 |
| WAR | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Emilio Pagán |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 11 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 4.1 | 10.0 |
| W | 0 | 1 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 8 | 6 |
| BB | 1 | 5 |
| ERA | 4.15 | 1.80 |
| WHIP | 0.92 | 1.20 |
| K/9 | 16.6 | 5.4 |
| BB/9 | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Garrett Cleavinger | Emilio Pagán |
|---|---|---|
| G | 241 | 522 |
| GS | 1 | 2 |
| IP | 216.1 | 549.1 |
| W | 17 | 33 |
| L | 20 | 28 |
| SV | 10 | 90 |
| SO | 275 | 626 |
| BB | 96 | 158 |
| ERA | 3.49 | 3.64 |
| WHIP | 1.23 | 1.07 |
| K/9 | 11.4 | 10.3 |
| BB/9 | 4.0 | 2.6 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| WAR | 1.7 | 4.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.