Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Isbel vs Ezequiel Tovar

In 2026 Ezequiel Tovar has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Isbel KC

Ezequiel Tovar COL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Isbel	Ezequiel Tovar
G	97	144
PA	323	506
H	66	102
HR	6	13
RBI	24	44
SB	6	8
AVG	.224	.219
OBP	.268	.264
SLG	.323	.353
OPS	.591	.617
ISO	.099	.133
BB%	4.6%	5.7%
K%	22.9%	25.5%
wOBA	.264	.271
wRC+	59	64
WAR	-0.4	0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Isbel	Ezequiel Tovar
G	566	557
PA	1,832	2,241
H	393	523
2B	75	124
3B	21	12
HR	29	64
RBI	168	230
BB	105	100
SO	393	602
SB	39	30
AVG	.235	.250
SLG	.357	.412
WAR	1.9	6.3

Kyle Isbel’s full profile →Ezequiel Tovar’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Isbel vs

Ezequiel Tovar vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.