Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Jazz Chisholm Jr. vs Yandy Díaz
In 2026 Yandy Díaz has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 13 |
| H | 0 | 3 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 3 |
| SB | 2 | 0 |
| AVG | .000 | .250 |
| OBP | .111 | .308 |
| SLG | .000 | .250 |
| OPS | .111 | .558 |
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 40 |
| PA | 111 | 160 |
| H | 17 | 30 |
| HR | 3 | 4 |
| RBI | 3 | 10 |
| BB | 10 | 15 |
| SO | 25 | 36 |
| SB | 10 | 0 |
| AVG | .172 | .208 |
| OBP | .255 | .287 |
| SLG | .283 | .347 |
| OPS | .537 | .635 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 136 | 154 |
| PA | 532 | 686 |
| H | 109 | 180 |
| HR | 19 | 22 |
| RBI | 55 | 85 |
| SB | 41 | 3 |
| AVG | .231 | .293 |
| OBP | .312 | .359 |
| SLG | .399 | .446 |
| OPS | .711 | .805 |
| ISO | .168 | .153 |
| BB% | 10.5% | 8.2% |
| K% | 29.5% | 14.3% |
| wOBA | .314 | .352 |
| wRC+ | 94 | 123 |
| WAR | 2.4 | 2.5 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 711 | 1,052 |
| PA | 2,877 | 4,441 |
| H | 631 | 1,137 |
| 2B | 95 | 210 |
| 3B | 19 | 8 |
| HR | 127 | 122 |
| RBI | 363 | 509 |
| BB | 253 | 465 |
| SO | 805 | 656 |
| SB | 171 | 14 |
| AVG | .245 | .291 |
| SLG | .444 | .442 |
| WAR | 16.6 | 22.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.